<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [The Pro Circuit] The Death of James Graham Ballard Considered as a Pornographic Spectacle</title>
	<link>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087</link>
	<description>Sponsored by Blowfish: Good Products for Great Sex.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nomadologic - J. G. Ballard again</title>
		<link>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-70356</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-70356</guid>
					<description>[...] One of his best - if not off-center - obituaries produced after his death. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] One of his best - if not off-center - obituaries produced after his death. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: d</title>
		<link>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67983</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67983</guid>
					<description>Cheers on the correction!

The rest of the article is spot on.  Ballard will be missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers on the correction!</p>
<p>The rest of the article is spot on.  Ballard will be missed.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas Roche</title>
		<link>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67973</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67973</guid>
					<description>Right you are -- my egregious mistake. In the case of "Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan," these were apparently *former* Situationists, and the original Situationists, while having roots in Marxism (and Lettrism) were indeed not even *remotely* Marxist-Leninists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are &#8212; my egregious mistake. In the case of &#8220;Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan,&#8221; these were apparently *former* Situationists, and the original Situationists, while having roots in Marxism (and Lettrism) were indeed not even *remotely* Marxist-Leninists.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: d</title>
		<link>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67932</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.blowfish.com/industry/the-pro-circuit-the-death-of-james-graham-ballard-considered-as-a-pornographic-spectacle/1087#comment-67932</guid>
					<description>The Situationists were not Marxist-Leninists.  Anyone who has read any material by the SI would know this, but even a quick read of the wikipedia article linked is sufficient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Situationists were not Marxist-Leninists.  Anyone who has read any material by the SI would know this, but even a quick read of the wikipedia article linked is sufficient.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
