It’s really disturbing.

And horrible abuse.

That poor woman…

Just an observation.

And an important one.

They say even if the wives aren’t willing - or they imply it or whatever - but really the wives on this site seem MORE than willing. It’s the husbands that seem a bit reluctant at first.

Why can they?

Because it’s their right.

You and I both disagree with them. If two people aren’t into this, they DON’T HAVE to do it. Or if one person is into it and another one is, they should not FORCE the person into it.

We are both logical thinking human beings, and we know this, and that’s why you and I both disagree with them.

But it’s still their right to say and spout whatever they want, as long as they aren’t doing anything about it by force.

Also, here’s a question. What’s the difference between them and Muslims who believe a woman can be disciplined or struck because THAT is actually IN the Koran?

I’ve actually heard of Muslim men who don’t want to hit their wives, so they rationalize it with “hit her with a scarf or a feather”. So it is apart of their religion in some way or form no matter what.

And my point is: Those people are allowed to practice the religion they choose to. They can do what they want!

As long as they aren’t going around in homes and forcing people to do what it is that they do, then I say they can yell “BEAT YOUR WIVES” from the roof tops.

Ultimately it’s up to people what they do and what they don’t want to do.

Also, I’d like to say your post made me laugh and I do see these people as hypocritical.

Birth control is a sin and you should only have vaginal intercourse for procreation. So it’s a wife’s duty to satisfy her husband in other ways. I believe that some of these guys use these rules because they don’t enjoy sex with women and think it’s a sin to be with the men they desire.

I met a woman on a chat board who married a fundamentalist with teen daughters that he had straddle his thigh bare ass
for their frequent punishments. She witnessed this before the marriage but their minister approved so she accepted it.

On their wedding night she got the same punishment for her misdeeds that she had committed before the wedding. She found it erotic so didn’t protest the daily hand spankings she received until he felt her debts were paid. Maintenance spankings became bi-weekly and increased in severity. After a year he instituted a Sat. punishment when the girls were at a teen church group.

She had to get naked and arrange herself on her knees over pillows on the bed, legs spread, ass raised and wait for her husband. He would enter the eoom remove his heavy belt and beat her with it as he lectured her on shortcomings as a wife. He never stopped until she was covered with welts from waist to knee including her inner thighs. When he thought.she wasn’t contrite enough he fallowed this with a rubber paddle. It ended with him sodomizing her. Then she was forgiven and put to bed.

This treatment caused her great shame and it took her months to talk about it. I immediately advised her to leave him. He found out and made her e-mail me that she deserved and freely accepted all punishment. She was put on daily spankings plus the Sat beatings. She chose to stay with him as God’s will even though the pleasure has been replaced with pain.and guilt. i think they have an S&M relationship cloaked in the bible.

It’s very sad. I enjoy erotic spanking no CDD, DD or master just hot sex. with my husband. She was and probally still is being beaten, Some woman stay because they believe they’ll go to hell if they leave. I believe they are in hell now.

Spanking, though, I can understand! For many, it’s important that the spanking not be just for fun, but that it should be real punishment. It’s the punishment aspect that is erotic. I understand that, too. What could be more erotic than spanking a female who comes to you and says with sincerity that she needs to be punished for such-and-such a transgression, and would you please do it? And then loves you for doing it? A very close bond is formed in this way.

Many a rocky relationship has been set straight by introducing some form of “spanking for punishment”, in play or for real. Whether it is the male or the female that does the spanking does not apparently matter, so long as one is the boss and is prepared to show it in the manner under discussion.

Rather than complaining, let’s celebrate the infinite variety of humanity!

OMG. I hadn’t even noticed that. And the really funny thing is: They got it wrong. When you click through the links to the writings of “Paul Bunyan,” you see that they were actually written by John Bunyan, author of “Pilgrim’s Progress.”

Sheesh. They can’t even get the names of their own admired heroes right.

this might be the weirdest thing on the site. Why is how Paul Bunyan, a nythical charcter of folklore treats his wife considered “gleanings from history”. I guess relisous types have a different definition of “hisSTORY”.

atheist